Highlights

Top LLMs like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity generate clear essays, but their tone often feels polished, formal, or compressed.
The five methods in this guide show how small edits can create a more natural, human reading rhythm without rewriting the entire draft.
Breaking up dense sections, adding specific examples, and softening transitions quickly remove the mechanical feel common in AI essays.
Real excerpts from each LLM reveal predictable patterns that improve immediately after tone adjustments are applied.
The same steps work across any model, which makes them reliable for students, editors, and content creators working with AI drafts.
Using a tool like WriteBros.ai offers a faster way to apply all five improvements in one pass while keeping the meaning intact.

AI essays can look polished at first glance, but the tone usually gives them away. Even the strongest models slip into writing that feels stiff, formal, or too safe.

To understand how different systems handle tone on their own, I asked ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity to write full essays using the same prompt. I let each model choose its own topic, which made the results more honest and easier to study.

This article is built around those samples. I’ll walk through five reliable ways to improve AI essay tone and show how each method changed the feel of the essays.

Table of Contents

5 Methods to Improve AI Essay Tone (Summary)

I wanted to outline the tone fixes I rely on the most.

These five methods work across almost any AI essay, no matter which model wrote it.

They make the writing sound clearer, more intentional, and less mechanical, and they help me understand what each LLM is doing well or missing.

Break up dense paragraphs.
Replace over-formal phrasing with plain, direct language.
Add specific details to reduce vagueness.
Vary sentence structure to avoid the “AI rhythm.”
Replace repetitive framing phrases with direct statements.

How to Improve AI Essay Tone: Prompt & LLM Examples

Before we get deep into the five tone methods, it helps to outline how the comparison works.

Here’s one simple prompt I used for all three models:

Write a 300-word essay on a general topic of your choice.
The essay should be informative, clear, and written with a neutral academic tone.
Avoid using bullet points, avoid headings, and avoid lists.
Write in full paragraphs only.
Do not write fiction, dialogue, or narrative scenes.
Keep the content accessible, straightforward, and suitable for a high school or college-level reader.

I kept it open-ended on purpose. I wanted the models to pick their own topics so their default tone patterns would appear naturally.

Here are the raw essays produced by top AI writing models. I kept them untouched so the initial tone, structure, and pacing are easy to see before any revisions.

ChatGPT Essay Sample

This is ChatGPT’s raw output based only on the shared prompt. I didn’t make any edits so the original tone and pacing stay visible.

ChatGPT focused on the role of critical thinking and how it supports learning, decision-making, and everyday problem-solving.

The essay reads smoothly and maintains a polished academic tone, though some sections feel slightly repetitive due to similar sentence structures. It closes with a clear argument for teaching critical thinking more intentionally, offering a steady and accessible explanation.

Gemini Essay Sample

Here is the untouched essay Gemini generated using the same prompt and instructions as the other models.

Gemini wrote about the dual impact of artificial intelligence on modern education, dividing the discussion into both opportunities and challenges.

The tone is organized and balanced, but it leans toward broad statements that feel more like an overview than a deep explanation. It ends with a concise reminder that thoughtful implementation is needed, keeping the structure clean but somewhat predictable.

Perplexity Essay Sample

Here is the untouched essay Perplexity generated using the same prompt and conditions as the other models.

Perplexity chose climate change as its topic and focused on explaining the causes, effects, and global impact in a steady, informational tone.

The essay stays structured and balanced, but it moves through each idea quickly, which gives it a slightly compressed feel. It ends with a broad call for collective action, keeping the overall message clear but somewhat general.

Based on the essays generated, here’s a quick breakdown:

LLM	Chosen Topic	Word Count	Mini Analysis
ChatGPT	Critical Thinking	~300 words	A steady, structured essay with a consistent academic tone.
Gemini	Artificial Intelligence in Education	~300 words	Dense and informative writing with a strong academic feel.
Perplexity	Climate Change	~300 words	Clear and factual explanation of key concepts in broad terms.

Now that the samples are out of the way, I can walk through the first tone fix you can apply.

This is usually the fastest improvement to spot when reading any AI-generated essay, and it sets the foundation for everything that follows.

I’m starting with it because the difference becomes obvious the moment you apply it.

Method 1: Break Up Dense Paragraphs

AI models tend to compress several ideas into a single block, especially when trying to sound organized or academic.

A recent linguistic analysis published on ResearchGate found that AI-generated academic writing tends to be denser in information compared to texts authored by humans, often packing multiple ideas into a single block without natural spacing or discourse markers.

I usually start by breaking these heavy sections into smaller paragraphs so each one carries only one main thought. This small adjustment changes the tone immediately because the writing feels clearer, slower, and more human.

To show how this works in practice, I started with ChatGPT’s essay on critical thinking. Its opening paragraph is clear, but it packs too many ideas into one place, which makes the tone feel heavier than it needs to.

Here’s how the paragraph looks before and after applying Method 1.

Before

Critical thinking plays a central role in helping individuals navigate the complexity of modern information environments. As students, professionals, and citizens encounter an increasing volume of data from diverse sources, the ability to evaluate claims, identify assumptions, and draw reasoned conclusions becomes essential. Critical thinking does not require advanced specialization; rather, it involves cultivating habits of reflection, questioning, and analysis that can be applied in everyday decision-making. When individuals learn to examine evidence carefully and recognize the influence of bias, they are better equipped to distinguish reliable information from misinformation or unsupported opinion.

After (Method 1 applied)

Critical thinking does not require advanced specialization; rather, it involves cultivating habits of reflection, questioning, and analysis that can be applied in everyday decision-making. When individuals learn to examine evidence carefully and recognize the influence of bias, they are better equipped to distinguish reliable information from misinformation or unsupported opinion.

Gemini’s essay on AI in education shows the same pattern in its introduction.

The first paragraph is packed with benefits, challenges, and context all at once, which makes the tone feel heavier than it needs to be.

Below is that opening paragraph before and after I broke it into smaller pieces using Method 1.

Before

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational systems marks a significant shift in pedagogical methods, presenting both unprecedented opportunities for personalized learning and considerable challenges related to equity and critical skill development. AI-powered tools, such as intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning platforms, are designed to analyze student performance data in real time, allowing the curriculum to adjust dynamically to individual pace and knowledge gaps. This level of customization offers the potential to move beyond the traditional one-size-fits-all classroom model, theoretically maximizing student engagement and optimizing learning outcomes across various subjects.

After (Method 1 applied)

This level of customization offers the potential to move beyond the traditional one-size-fits-all classroom model, theoretically maximizing student engagement and optimizing learning outcomes across various subjects.

When I looked at Perplexity’s sample, the first paragraph immediately stood out.

The ideas are accurate, but the definition, causes, and early consequences are all packed together, which makes the tone heavier than necessary.

Separating those thoughts into smaller pieces creates a smoother, more human rhythm, as shown below:

Before

Climate change represents one of the most pressing global challenges of the twenty-first century. It refers to long-term shifts in temperature, precipitation, and other atmospheric conditions, primarily driven by human activities such as burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial emissions. These actions increase the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, trapping heat and altering climate patterns. The consequences of these changes can be observed through rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems worldwide.

After (Method 1 applied)

These actions increase the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, trapping heat and altering climate patterns. The consequences of these changes can be observed through rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems worldwide.

After improving the pacing, the next issue shows up in how each model handles sentence length. Even when the ideas are clear, the flow becomes stiff because the sentences follow a predictable rhythm.

The second method looks at how to break that pattern and create a more natural tone.

Method 2: Replace Over-Formal Phrasing with Plain, Direct Language

AI essays often drift into stiff, overly academic phrasing because the model tries to imitate formal writing styles.

This matches findings from a linguistic study on academic readability, which notes that highly formal language can reduce clarity and reader engagement.

I usually fix this by replacing heavy phrases with simpler wording that keeps the meaning while making the tone feel human.

ChatGPT’s sample shows this clearly in transitions. Phrases like “in academic settings” or “beyond the classroom” are technically correct, but they feel like template language.

Rewriting the phrases as “in school” or “outside of class” preserves the meaning while lightening the tone.

Before

In academic settings, critical thinking supports deeper learning by encouraging students to move beyond memorization. It enhances comprehension by prompting learners to make connections among concepts, assess the strength of arguments, and consider alternative interpretations.

After (Method 2 applied)

In school, critical thinking helps students learn in a deeper way instead of just memorizing facts. It makes lessons clearer by helping them connect ideas, weigh different arguments, and see other possible explanations.

Gemini is the model that sounded the most formal in this batch. Its introduction uses long academic phrases that make the tone feel heavier than it needs to be.

Here’s the paragraph before and after I rewrote it using plain, direct language.

Before

After (Method 2 applied)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing how schools teach and how students learn. Tools like intelligent tutors and adaptive learning platforms track student performance in real time and adjust lessons to each student’s pace and gaps.

This kind of customization helps schools move away from a one-size-fits-all classroom. It can keep students more engaged and give them a better chance to improve across different subjects.

Perplexity also leans into formal language, but in a slightly different way. Its writing sounds more like a scientific report, especially in how it introduces climate science terms and long technical descriptions.

Here’s the section I rewrote to show how the tone softens once the wording is simplified.

Before

After (Method 2 applied)

Climate change is one of the biggest issues we face today. It includes long-term changes in temperature and weather patterns, mostly caused by things like burning fossil fuels, cutting down forests, and pollution from industry.

Once the text has better rhythm, the next challenge is the voice itself. Each model uses safe, neutral phrasing that sounds polished but distant.

The third method focuses on adding warmth without changing the meaning, so the writing feels like it came from a person rather than a system.

Method 3: Add Specific Details to Reduce Vagueness

AI essays usually sound neutral and polished, but that smoothness comes at a cost: the writing becomes vague.

Many models default to broad claims because they prioritize general correctness over concrete detail. Research on AI-generated educational text shows that this generalization happens because the model avoids committing to specifics it might get wrong.

I normally fix this by adding one or two small, real-world details that sharpen the meaning without overwhelming the paragraph.

ChatGPT tends to explain ideas in broad, sweeping lines, and the critical thinking sample is no different. The points it makes are accurate, but they stay abstract unless you anchor them in real situations.

Here’s a short excerpt where I added a simple, specific example to make the tone feel more grounded.

Before

It enhances comprehension by prompting learners to make connections among concepts, assess the strength of arguments, and consider alternative interpretations.

After (Method 3 applied)

It enhances comprehension by helping learners link ideas together, evaluate how strong an argument is, and think through different explanations. A simple example is comparing two news articles that describe the same event but present it in different ways.

Gemini writes in a very broad and high-level way, especially in the introduction. The ideas are accurate, but they stay abstract until you add a small, concrete detail.

Here is one excerpt where I grounded the explanation with a specific example to make the tone clearer.

Before

The integration of Artificial Intelligence into educational systems marks a significant shift in pedagogical methods, presenting opportunities for personalized learning and challenges related to equity and skill development.

After (Method 3 applied)

The integration of Artificial Intelligence into schools is changing how teachers teach and how students learn. One clear example is the use of adaptive math platforms that give easier or harder questions based on a student’s recent answers, which makes the idea of personalized learning feel more concrete.

Perplexity’s writing is clear, but it stays very broad. It explains climate change in wide categories that sound correct but still feel distant.

Adding one small, concrete detail helps the paragraph feel more grounded and less like a summary written for a textbook. Here is a short excerpt that shows the difference.

Before

The consequences of these changes can be observed through rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and disruptions to ecosystems worldwide.

After (Method 3 applied)

The consequences of these changes can be seen in rising sea levels, stronger storms, and damage to ecosystems. A clear example is coral bleaching, which happens when warmer ocean temperatures cause reefs to lose their color and break down over time.

Method 4: Vary Sentence Structure to Avoid the “AI Rhythm”

AI essays often fall into a predictable rhythm. Sentences are usually similar in length, follow the same subject-verb pattern, and end with a tidy summary. This pattern makes the writing sound balanced but also robotic.

I usually fix this by mixing short and long sentences, adding small pauses, or rearranging the order of a thought to create a more natural flow.

ChatGPT is the easiest example here. Its critical thinking essay uses steady, evenly spaced sentences almost throughout.

Changing one sentence to something shorter, then following it with a slightly longer one, makes the paragraph feel more natural.

Before

Critical thinking does not require advanced specialization; rather, it involves cultivating habits of reflection, questioning, and analysis that can be applied in everyday decision-making.

After (Method 4 applied)

Critical thinking does not depend on advanced training. It grows from small habits instead, such as taking time to reflect, asking honest questions, and looking closely at what something really means. People can use those habits in everyday decisions, not only in formal study.

Gemini does the same thing but in a more formal way. Its sentences often stretch out in long, layered structures that repeat a similar rhythm.

Breaking one long sentence into two shorter ones changes the pace enough to make the tone feel friendlier.

Before

A primary advantage of this technology lies in its ability to offer instantaneous and highly specific feedback, effectively functioning as an always available digital assistant for both students and teachers.

After (Method 4 applied)

One clear advantage of this technology is the speed and accuracy of its feedback. It gives students and teachers updates right away, and that makes the work feel more manageable. It also acts as a digital helper that is available whenever someone needs support.

Perplexity also leans into this consistent pattern, especially in its introduction on climate change. The sentences match in shape and cadence, which gives the paragraph a smooth but artificial feel.

Adjusting one sentence to be more direct or slightly shorter disrupts that uniformity and helps the writing sound more human.

Before

Climate change represents one of the most pressing global challenges of the twenty first century.

After (Method 4 applied)

Climate change shapes many parts of daily life, and people in every region feel its effects. It influences weather patterns, food systems, and long term planning for entire communities. It has become a shared challenge that asks everyone to think more carefully about how the planet is changing.

After working through the earlier adjustments, one pattern becomes clear. Each model adds solid information, but the writing still carries that polished, slightly distant tone AI tends to lean toward.

The final method is meant to soften that edge even further. It adds the small human cues that make text feel lived in, not generated.

Method 5: Replace Repetitive Framing Phrases With Direct Statements

AI essays often rely on familiar framing phrases because they help models stay safe and organized.

These include lines like:

In conclusion
Overall
One major effect
This shows that
Another key point

They are not wrong, but when they appear repeatedly, the tone starts sounding mechanical instead of intentional.

You can improve the tone by removing these predictable openers and replacing them with direct statements. The idea is not to cut structure, but to express it in cleaner ways.

ChatGPT leans on familiar framing phrases at the start of its paragraphs. They keep the structure neat, but after a while the essay sounds like it is working from a template instead of a real student voice.

Here is one section where I removed the stock opener and turned it into a direct statement.

Before

Beyond the classroom, critical thinking contributes to responsible participation in society.

After (Method 5 applied)

Critical thinking also helps people take part in society in a more responsible way.

Gemini leans on big framing words to signal its final point. The closing paragraph starts with “Ultimately,” which sounds tidy but also a bit like a textbook conclusion.

Here is how that line looks before and after turning it into a direct statement.

Before

Ultimately, the successful and ethical implementation of AI in education hinges on achieving a strategic balance.

After (Method 5 applied)

The successful and ethical use of AI in education depends on finding a real balance between efficiency and human judgment.

Perplexity likes to wrap up with polished signals that a conclusion is coming. In this essay, it leans on “In sum,” which is clear but also formulaic.

Here is how that line looks before and after softening the transition.

Before

In sum, climate change is not a distant threat but a current and evolving reality.

After (Method 5 applied)

Climate change is not a distant threat but a current and evolving reality that communities must respond to now.

Now that every method has been applied across the three essays, the picture is easier to see.

These tweaks do not rewrite the entire piece, they simply guide the tone into something steadier and more human. It sets up a good final look at everything pulled together.

Apply All Five Methods Faster with WriteBros.ai

If you want a quicker way to apply the same tone fixes used in this guide, WriteBros.ai handles most of them automatically. It smooths stiff sections, adds variation, and reduces that polished academic tone that LLMs default to.

The tool also improves pacing and transitions, which means you do not have to adjust each paragraph by hand. You can drop in the raw essay and get a version that sounds closer to natural writing without losing meaning.

It works well when you are editing multiple LLM samples and need the tone to stay consistent across all drafts.

Ready to Transform Your AI Content?

Try WriteBros.ai and make your AI-generated content truly human.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Why do AI essays often sound flat or overly formal?

Most AI models rely on patterns found in academic and informational writing, which leads to polished but distant tone. Without small human adjustments, the sentences follow predictable shapes that reduce warmth and personality.

Do I need to rewrite an entire AI essay to improve its tone?

Usually not. Small changes to pacing, examples, transitions, and structure are enough to shift the tone into something clearer and more natural. Full rewrites are rarely needed unless the content is incorrect.

Can these tone-improvement methods work for long essays too?

Yes. The same five methods scale well for longer writing and help keep the tone steady across sections. They also reduce repetitive phrasing, which can be more noticeable in long-form drafts.

Does improving tone help with AI detection scores?

Tone adjustments can sometimes lower detection scores because they add natural variation. More human-like rhythm and structure reduce the patterns detectors look for, but results depend on the tool.

What if the AI model keeps generating the same tone even with better prompts?

Some models default to familiar tone patterns no matter how the prompt is written. The fastest fix is to generate the essay once and then apply the five tone-improvement methods manually. This gives you more control over the final voice.

Conclusion

AI essays give you a solid base, but the tone usually needs a little help to feel natural.

The five methods in this guide show how small changes create a clearer and more human rhythm without rewriting the entire draft.

ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity each respond well to these adjustments, and once you know what to look for, the fixes become quick and predictable.

Whether you edit manually or use a tool like WriteBros.ai, the goal is simple: a tone that feels genuine and easy to read.

About the Author

Aljay Ambos is a marketing and SEO consultant, AI writing expert, and LLM analyst with five years in the tech space. He works with digital teams to help brands grow smarter through strategy that connects data, search, and storytelling. Aljay combines SEO with real-world AI insight to show how technology can enhance the human side of writing and marketing.

Connect with Aljay on LinkedIn